Anthropology and more

Anthropology – how it works or: once it is always the first time

Create an image of your superiority; then behave according to the image and confront with “the other” – but do so after creating the other as inferior. If you do not make a mistake on the way you will be in (I guess) 80+ percent of the cases be able to maintain your prejudices.

Advanced version: To show your superiority return to your own tribe of white people and say that “the other” also should have rights – refer to the universal declaration and highlight the importance of article 23 and 25, especially highlighting the implication of a capitalist system, based on employment etc..

Further possible advancement: upload this proof of your superiority on youtube (or the like) to let the world know about your wisdom – as the world won’t be able to follow the entire story, make sure that you tell only half of it – don’t worry that it may cause some disorientation as half of the truth may be a complete lie.

Peak of wisdom: you do it not as anthropologist but as school and advise your government – as Mr. Rostow (and many others) did in the spirit of a non-communist manifesto. Even go a step further: Rather than accepting the need for real and critical confrontation you declare your work as part of the war against evil and terror.

NB: working as academic, make sure to use fancy titles and expressions like Clash of Civilisations or End of History. By such (sometimes publisher-provoked) modes of flattening actually highly interesting arguments you will lessen the impact on truly academic debates but you will increase sales figures and you will also scale up on impact  and ranking lists.

Conclusion: this principle pattern can be used in various situations, not only the one depicted inn the clips. It can also be applied in debates on religion, ethnicity, social class and not least in justifying the lack of democratic processes. As Nira Yuval-Davis writes

Different social divisions, such as class, race and ethnicity, tend to have certain parameters. They tend to be ‘naturalized’, to be seen as resulting from biological destiny linked to differential genetic pools of intelligence and personal characteristics*

Recommendation: make sure that you avoid education.

___________________________

* Yuval-Davis, Nira, 2006: Intersectionality and Feminist Politics; in: European Journal of Women’s Studies; London et altera: Sage; 13/3: 193-209: here: 199, with reference to Cohen, Philip, 1998: The Perversions of Inheritance; in: Cohen, Philip/Bains, Harwant S. (eds.) Multi-Racist Britain; London: Macmillan

It could be different …

It could be different, but it is possible this way too ….

These are words of the last e-mail before the INKRIT-meeting, gathering for some general debates, and mainly working on the Historical-Critical Dictionary Marxism, referring to Brecht’s Three-Penny Opera.

The location of a rather intense couple of days: Esslingen, a small town, or even village in the proximity of Stuttgart, in Southern German. Writing: or even village means that I actually didn’t see it. Arriving there by train Wednesday night, I took the bus to a remote conference-hotel, not really seeing anything of the place. And remote means remote, giving an exciting view: the (low) mountains, the valley covered by the raising fog – a carpet – seen from the height, a ceiling from the other side … It actually is different, depending on the side from which we look.

The usual ‘regular verb’ behaviourthe meeting in of the editorial board of The Argument as new field of activities and then the workshops. A rather interesting, not to say exciting work. Discussions that seem to be as remote even from our daily academic work as the Jaegerhof and even Esslingen. And although the debates are intense, it is in some way relaxing: concentrated on such a wide range of areas as Human Rights to Laughing, as life conduct to courtesan ….. And ranging as wide rural exodus – a term in itself so varied if looked at by the colleagues from Germany or Cuba and Brazil.

And relaxing in any case, being directly engaged – ex officio so to say – with Étienne Balibar on whose draft I comment or as listener, just ordinary participant. And as relaxed as all this is, as open the debate is there is surely also the tension. How to describe it? Between those who own all the experience simply due to age and those who have all impartiality on their side – sure one may also say: the claim of authority versus, or going hand in hand with gormlessness, and the deadlock engaging with innovativeness. The productive tensions as well, growing out of so different people meeting there: Brasil, Cuba, Germany, Italy, France …; villages, large cities ….

Yes, all could be different. And perhaps that is what makes it so inviting: A tension one can perceive as relaxing in its open way, as it aims on producing something new, aims on making a difference rather than continuing to move along, the dogtrot. So remote, even the tensions being so remote that I only mentioning its actual meaning after Mehmet dropped me at Stuttgart’s train station. First plans for future collaboration – the hug when we say farewell – knowing it is this way possible too. And emerging in relaxed atmosphere around Stuttgart’s train-station: people enjoying the sun, licking ice or sitting in the sun” the German Sunday-tradition: “coffee and cake” ….

… and the flowers in front of the station:  a reminder: Stuttgart 21 – not always as peaceful as it appears on the Sunday afternoon, not always as remote from daily quarrels as it suggests this sunny afternoon. And I feel as well how important all these apparently purely academic debates are in order to make sense, to change such reality. 

It could be different, but it is possible this way too …. – and to make it possible that the daily, centered around commodities, consumption, so-called performance possible in everyday’s life we need the remoteness: clear, concise thinking: exhausting, focused, provoking to contradict and not allowing any contradiction.

It is also something that is so simple, and so difficult to achieve. An excellent, energising experience – though showing how remote we are ourselves from really living it, maintaing so many illusions, voluntarily chosen subordinations and authoritative deification. But at least there is an open field for contest – from which academic life distanced itself so much.

All has to be different, it only pretends to be possible this way too …

 

 

 

 

 

Breaks – Still on the Way to Modernity

Pioneer of Modern Art – the English translation doesn’t catch the ambiguity of the German title of the exhibition of the work of Max Liebermann to which I went during the lunch break: Wegbereiter der Moderne. It could also be translated just as Pioneer, trailblazer of modernity, emphasising that he had been a pioneer not just as somebody who did something before others did the same, but underlining his proactive role, the ‘fight for something’. And it doesn’t limit the something to arts but leaves it open for a much wider scope.

I do not want and cannot engage in Max Liebermann’s complex and contradictory personality: citoyen and demotic; orderly, like the lanes in the part of his villa and allowing, provoking and even planning the impressionistic as seen in the flowerbeds on the roadside of the little palace ….

Surely as such – as other representatives especially of the citoyenitée of the time (see Thomas and Heinrich Mann, read the Buddenbrooks, The Small Town Tyrant, The Forsyte Saga ….) – reflecting very much the contradiction of the time.

One thing is sure: in life and in general there is surely not one pioneer – it is people as groups, peoples and personalities …

…. and it is about movements, ‘inventions of acceptance’. Entering the exhibition had been already exciting by looking at the plain pictures of life – ‘socialist realism’ came to my mind. Looking at his depiction of the twelve year old Jesus in the Temple – emerging as another simple life: simplicity of deification without simplifying the apotheosis; and then looking at her, looking into her face: Eva. It is a painting from 1882. And the way she looks says it all: No need, Adam. Not for you. And though I my not look like it. I have the apple, I eat the apple and I enjoy eating it.

Giving the impression of weakness and happiness, of inferiority and forcefulness … – modernity.

Not November …. – On Path Dependency

It hadn’t been often that I had been in Bonn – and I do not want to be negative. It is a nice, placid village, once the capital of Germany, hosting that part of Germany, better: German mentality which had been twice the cradle of a World War

I hadn’t been many times in Berlin – the first time I arrived there in the ‘new era’ had been some strange experience – the government had not yet moved to the new centre, but part of it and as had been on government-meeting then, I experienced the tension between the old: the West, and the new, the East. It is a difficult to tell story too interesting to put into a nutshell. When I returned later I had been impressed, the feeling of …, well, perhaps the best term to be used is: the feeling of mental suppression. Again, I do not want to be negative, knowing about the stirring figures as Friedrich Wilhelm Humboldt, having lived mentally side by side with notable people as Helene Weigel and having known extraordinary colleagues as Juergen Kuczynski …, and having enjoyed the great Jazz-festival, the theaters, parks …. of this city which than later showed so open its difficult to figure-out hegemonic spirit of violence and mental control – mentor of Otto von Bismarck’s policy which became known as cradle of the social state and which had been in some way the accoucheur of the first world war.

Sure, globalisation, postmodernisation …. – the entire world changed and so did the country of which Bonn had been and Berlin is the capital. And so did the cities themselves.

Still – if you look for synonyms you may find for placid: introspective and you may find for impressing: imposing.

It is impressive, arriving here and there always reminds me of Heinrich Heine – and his return to Germany. It had been a long time ago, it had been November.

See here for more.

But I am here to talk about Human Rights – perhaps it is a different thing …, perhaps ….

END OF HISTORY OR IS IT A NEW BEGINNNG?

No sign’s descended from the sky about the days to come

We’ve promised those days to ourselves.

I want a song about the days after we win …

‘Who knows, maybe tomorrow …’

(Nazim Hikmet)

It is a fascinating story, indeed.

 Turkey is undoubtedly the country of the future, but will it always be? Can it ever become what it hopes to be, or is it condemned to remain an unfulfilled dream, an exquisite fantasy that contains within it the seeds of its own failure?

There are as yet no answers to the questions, and therein lies the Turkish conundrum. This nation is still very much the a work in progress, a dazzling kaleidoscope of competing images and ideas. …

This is taken from Stephen Kinzer’s book.* May be something had been lost during the writing and/or revision? “We” are perfect, reached the end of history, are not work in progress, and “we” found all the answers? The cowboy speaks of the prevalent

 primitive mentality of rural peasants.

__________________

I am sitting on the 9 o’clock flight to Istanbul, later continuing to Bonn where I will have to speak the next day on the conference on Human Rights in a Globalized World – Challenges for The Media.

A modern aircraft – and of course I feel somewhat relieved – rather than being “the other”, barely being able to really thank Mehmet in Turkish words for all his kindness throughout my time at ODTUe (but words are surely not all – we developed an excellent relation of understanding; he will be surely one of those who would offer me asylum if needed), now being able to speak agin with words, most likely being understood by “the other”, just being an other, able to merge with others. And I still feel well looked after – sure, staff being paid – being paid by THY, but still not having lost their ‘natural friendliness’, a mentality of …, being human, being humane, being together – at least for the time of the flight, and with this at least for some time together in a limited space with a vast array of options: the most likely a safe landing, the unlikely but possible the end of …., well: personal history, of life as consequence of a ‘simple crash’, of being victim of any kind of politics …; and possibly also the beginning of a new history: lasting friendships can develop everywhere and anywhere where we still find humans, humane beings …

…. primitive mentality of rural peasants.

May be – finally we cannot simply shake-off our history, in political science we call it path dependency. And there had been countries of peasants and other countries may be seen as countries of cowboys. At least the first sort of countries never went to real war and pretended to be world gendarmes …

I remember some figures from Kinzer’s book:

A public opinion survey taken after Clinton’s visit found that 52 percent of Turks had a favourable opinion of the United States; by 2006 the number had fallen to an abysmal 12 percent. When asked in the 2006 poll which countries they believed threatened world peace, 60percent of Turks named the United States. (Only 16 percent named Iran, which George W. Bush was thendenouncing as part of the global ‘axis of evil.”)**

And shortly after presenting these results he states

This

particular reference is made to the anti-Islamist war of the Bush administration

produced a broad national consensus that Turkey needed to break out of Washington’s orbit and pursue an independent foreign policy – something Turkish leftists had been urging for years without success.***

Is it really by chance that around this year Turkey took over the Presidency of the Organization of the Islamic Conference?

And is it by accident that Turkey took also a leading role in the Economic Cooperation Union, for instance by co-founding the Economic Cooperation Organization Trade and Development Bank?

__________________

Later the day: I think it is the third time in my life that I am in Bonn – former capital of my former home-country – I stayed more often in most of the other capitals of the EU-member states than here. And the two times I had been here before “I came from Europe”, having been there in connection with some EU-business around asylum seekers and anti-social policy. Now I come from another perspective – a little bit another perspective: Human Rights.

On another occasion I will come back to it: unconditional, undeniable and indivisible. And as such only then meaningful, only then a matter of guaranteeing fundamental rights if it is possible to rebuke fundamentalism: the ruling of Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s and  Ahmet Davutoğlu’s move towards tolerance and even supp-ort of Islamist fundamentalism and George Walker Bush’s Christian fundamentalism alike, the latter claiming according to the Guardian that

God told me to end the tyranny in Iraq.

But the really dangerous fundamentalism is the one onto which both obviously merge: the fundamentalism fundamentalism of unbridled market capitalism.

And this is surely exactly today, on the occasion of being here in order to discuss Human Rigths of special relevance

In 2009, UNCTAD, stated in a document titled

The Global Economic Crisis: Systemic Failures and Multilateral Remedies

Market fundamentalist laissez-faire of the last 20 years has dramatically failed the test

__________________

It is a long time ago – I arrived in the German capital – probably in the 1970s.

Sure, many things went wrong, showing – possibly – even disastrous consequences. But there had been one thing we knew during that meeting: Human Rights is surely not least about something different: rather than being a matter of “granting rights”, Human Rights are about another society. And that will be a topic that is more likely to be discussed during the workshop in Esslingen next week, the adage Humane Standards and Capitalist Greed****

 _____________________________________________

**********************

_____________________________________________

* Crescent & Star. Turkey between two worlds: NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2001/2008 (revised edition): 28

Leaving the cowboy aside, from my perspective it is – with all caution that is always required – a book that is worthwhile reading. A kind of rough guide to Turkey – though not as rough as the touristy thing with that name.

** 217

*** 219

**** actually it cannot be properly translated: Menschliches Maß und kapitalistische Maßlosigkeit – it could mean humane standards but also standards of humanity or standards defined by human beings …

The Game is Over or: Strawberry Cake

I remember Niklas Luhmann once writing or telling this little anecdote: a couple, married since many years … – and the housewife (well, yes, it had been last century, and not at its very end), so: the housewife made every year a “birthday surprise cake” for her husband: strawberry cake. He enjoyed every year, showed his pleasure by indulging into it … Well, and then it happened once up a time … – Listen to her: “darling, I am so very sorry but you know, I have had these problems, couldn’t …, well, to cut a long story short: I had not been able to have your favourite cake for today’s birthday.” She was near to crying, but he approached her tenderly, saying: “Listen, love. To be honest, I don’t really like strawberry cake. But seeing you every year, looking at you how much you enjoyed seeing me eating the cake …, well I didn’t want to take this joy from you.”

The game was over, of course.

And so is my game here – a different one, but still similar to the life of the couple and also with that of my highly esteemed colleague Immanuel, occasionally seen as  “regular verb” not least on grounds of his legendary daily walk.

More or less the last day – and despite some irregularities: wrapping up stuff, final discussions, posting some stuff to Ireland before carrying it with be over the next months the regularities. And in this light, I had been over the last days getting increasingly aware of the play-fullness of many things: breakfast: Gülistan bringing me the most beautiful Turkish coffee, Yusuf getting later the simit for me, and a tea, the daily swim, after the first four hour shift between 6: 30 and 10: 30; going afterwards grabbing something to eat, walking back to the office, eating, drinking the lovely Ayran, getting another tea from Mehmed, before heading to the library …

Later back – “in the public”, there it is where at least for me the routines are getting so clear – clear to me and to the others and in the interaction with the others . The routines getting clear by the questions that do not need to be asked …, and that nevertheless are asked. Tea? Coffee? These questions are asked and they evoke a smile when the reply is the one that bad been expected. …

The end of the game … – no coffee, no tea anymore …. – only breakfast in the morning before a irregular day: going to Ankara, meeting friends.

No, in the simit restaurant here on the campus people didn’t know it –from where should they, we could speak just by gestures, smiles, signs … “This is Yusuf” – the first day I am told his name. “And I am Suleyman. What is your name?” “I am Peter”. Yusuf stretches the had out to me. Gülistan smiles at me.

No, they do not know – Mehmet knows .. . We meet later, this day I had to return to the office, clear up in the office. Mehmet knows. We embrace, kiss the cheeks, like “real men” … güle güle ….  The game is over … . And we both new: not a game – it never had been a game and it never will be a game. And only when we pretend things being one, we can get aware of how serious it actually is.

… like being stuck in strawberry cake.

But I am first stuck in further work for a while …

The War – Finally Won? Or: Responsibility of Education

“There is no such thing as society”- Margaret Thatcher is famous for these words. And here is a little bit more context – and extract from the interview she gave in September 1977 for Woman’s Own

I think we have gone through a period when too many children and people have been given to understand “I have a problem, it is the Government’s job to cope with it!” or “I have a problem, I will go and get a grant to cope with it!” “I am homeless, the Government must house me!” and so they are casting their problems on society and who is society? There is no such thing! There are individual men and women and[fo 1] there are families and no government can do anything except through people and people look to themselves first. It is our duty to look after ourselves and then also to help look after our neighbour and life is a reciprocal business and people have got the entitlements too much in mind without the obligations, because there is no such thing as an entitlement unless someone has first met an obligation and it is, I think, one of the tragedies in which many of the benefits we give, which were meant to reassure people that if they were sick or ill there was a safety net and there was help, that many of the benefits which were meant to help people who were unfortunate—” It is all right. We joined together and we have these insurance schemes to look after it” . That was the objective, but somehow there are some people who have been manipulating the system and so some of those help and benefits that were meant to say to people: “All right, if you cannot get a job, you shall have a basic standard of living!” but when people come and say: “But what is the point of working? I can get as much on the dole!” You say: “Look” It is not from the dole. It is your neighbour who is supplying it and if you can earn your own living then really you have a duty to do it and you will feel very much better!”

Indeed, it is a whole mindset – and leaving Falkland aside, leaving other wars aside which had been fought for one or the other side with success during the 1980s this can be seen as a victory not just for the then British government but for a story that finds roots in the Scottish and English enlightenment: An economic system and its justification which meant that finally the bourgeois besieged the citoyen (not by accident we speak of a bourgeois revolution and in English language [like in German language] we barely know a term for the citoyen): the free marketer and his basis: the free producer winning over the free spirit and his foundation: the free thinker.

Indeed, the free spirit, the free thinkers of that very time when Bentham, Mills and Smith urged for their stance had been very much … – well, actually from the same idealist gauge as their bourgeois complements. Still, there had been a difference. The liberalism in economic meant pleading for a system that was devised with certain characteristics undermining the freedom it claimed: this kind of competition meant the systematic founding block for economic oligopolistic and monopolist power; the accumulation mean the systematic tendency of the profit rate to fall, thus urging to financalisation … – and most importantly: the freedom of the labourer meant – as Marx emphasised – being free in the double sense of being free as person, i.e. not being owned as slaves or in a relationship of personal dependence from a landlord: free to sell their ability to work to any employer; and also free from the means of production other than their own capacity to work (thus selling their labour power rather than their labour or the product of it.)

It is not completely correct to speak of idealism in many cases – it had been just the ‘oversight’ of biased economists viewpoints, being caught in their cages of the emerging bourgeois society.

As said, their citoyen-contemporaries and actually – though not necessarily knowingly and/or willingly – allies had been surely idealists. And though the German language doesn’t have word for the citoyen, they have had plenty of them: they still occasionally claim to be the nation of poets and philosophers. One of them: the great Johann Wolfgang von Goethe.

In his scientific studies we find thought-provoking passage. He contended:

To know nature, one ought to be nature itself. What one is able to express of nature is always something specific, that is it is something real, something actual, namely something in relation to oneself. But what we express is not all that is; it is not the whole nature. … Although they can say nothing of things-in-themselves, that is, are out of relation to us and we to them, and because we recognize everything that we say to be in our own mode of representation … it is evident that they at least agree with us that what human beings can predicate of things does not exhaust their nature …*

Three positions, at first sight close to each other:

There is no such thing as society

And they are so different in their final substance:

* The free spirit, claiming individuality as personality, well educated (German language has the term Bildungsbuerger – I don’t know exactly what it means: the citoyen rooted in education? Or the citoyen living amongst educated citoyens? Or the citoyen living through behaving in an educated way? – Nuances, opening a wide array for a discourse on civilisation. In any case somebody for whom ‘egoism’ is inherently linked to, undeniable knows that this individual being is only possible and meaningful as part of a universe. And, though possibly Christian, believer in god, convinced that achieving the good depends on his action, immediately acknowledging this embeddedness.

* The utilitarian: bourgeois, surely not egoist in a strict sense, guided by moral sentiments and trusting that the good will be result of an invisible hand of gods goodness or the markets mystic power.

* The iron lady – in a way we may feel pity for her as she is assigned the role of having not only phrased this loss so well but also being responsible for it: Thatcherism. And indeed, she had been the ‘winner’, in a way we may say her evil spirit transforming Labour (if there had been such thing as real Labour – but that is another question, part of it already discussed in Marx’ work Critique of the Gotha Programme. But as much as her success had been carrying on into the future we should not give her too much credit: she continued very much what had been structurally engraved in the blind trust in the free market, and in the trust in relative productivity advantage (surely very bold: one could see Ricardo as a forerunner of Amartya’s and Martha’s capability approach**) and the cunning*** of the nation (sorry lads, I know, you only wanted the best).

In this light, MT had been only describing a reality.

Still, there is another light – and with this I come to the responsibility education has to accept. Thatcher only executed a tendency that had been strucutrally inherent in the development of the British and world economy. But nevertehless – is this part of the cunning of reason Hegel did not have in mind? – she planted the seeds: nurtured and cultivated a mindset that – with some exceptions as for instance the miners’ and printers’ strike – allowed to structures to take over: to become the one reality of various realities that would have been possible.

And this is what we, those working and studying in the academic world – should never forget: there is only one reality, but there are different ways to shape it.  Surely without pleading for an idealist approach – seeing it as matter of practice in the truest sense instead – I think we are as well responsible as we are not just working with students as they come (not least as they come from an overwhelmingly authoritarian schooling system, with the experience of living in an undemocratic, consumerist, competition oriented society …) but as well with students how they want to can be. To show how the ballast can and has to be left behind means not least showing what democracy, transparency, empowerment etc. means. Preaching virtue is not worth the paper they are written on as long as we do not – collectively – show ho they can be lived. To paraphrase the young Marx:

The idea emerges as material power if and when it merges with the mass of the people.

I want to remind you at what Ernst Bloch pointed out – and quote a summary from a text I write and that will soon be published,

highlighting four different kinds of possibilities, namely (i) the formally possible – what is possible according to its logical structure; (ii) the objectively possible – possible being based on assumptions on the ground of epistemologically based knowledge; (iii) the objectively possible – possible as it follows from the options inherently given by the object; (iv) and the objectively real possible – possible by following the latency and tendency which is inherent in its elementary form

(see Bloch, Ernst, 1959: Prinzip Hoffnung; Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp [written in 1938-1947; reviewed 1953 and 1959]: 258-288; Herrmann, Peter: forthcoming: God, Rights, Law and a Good Society. Overcoming Religion and Moral as Social Policy Approach in a Godless and Amoral Society; Herrmann, Peter, forthcoming: Searching for Global Policy).

 _____________________________

*******************

_____________________________

* Goethe, Johan Wolfgang, 1827: Conversations with Riemar; 2.8.1827; in: Goethe’s Gespraeche; Flodoard Freiherr von Biedermann; Leipzig: 1909-1911 (five volumes): I: 505; quoted in: Goethe on Science. An Anthology of Goethe’s Scientific Writings. Selected by Jeremy Naydler; Edinburgh: Floris Books, 1996/2006: 124 f.

** I want to add that I have really great personal respect for both of them! And this statement should not in any way be misinterpreted as offense!

*** The German word for cunning is List – and it had been Friedrich List whom we may see as founder and promoter of a system of national economic systems (of innovation).

Globalisation – Sunrise

When the sun rises, it makes the one staying in the shadow feeling comfortable; the one who happens to be unshaded feels uncomfortable feels uncomfortable and even bad. Still, no one dares to to ‘for’ or ‘against’ such a development because the celestial body is not responsible for who and why has happened to be in the worse or better conditions. These are problems of another type: social problems related to the issue of equality, social justice, etc. Therefore, one should confront not natural developments but unjust social relations. At the same time, one should have in mind that, in spite of the objective and the subjective to be interconnected into the organic whole, the subjective factor is not able to dominate natural development. It, nevertheless, plays an important, sometimes even decisive role in human destiny.

Alexander N. Chumakov, 2008: Recognizing Globalization; in: Alexander N. Chumakov: Philosophy of Globalization. Selected Articles; Moscow, 2010: 36

Philosophy of Kerbstones – An Interim Conclusion: Stones and Fields

None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.

–Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

Добро пожаловать в Москву, Питер – I don’t really understand a word, only that hostage finally begins. Тимофей? – Yes, that is me, indeed! Timofey is my host, well a kind of. As usually on these occasions, especially in countries like Taiwan, Japan, Poland, Russia, Moldova I am well looked after. Not that it would be only in these countries – in other places it is just a different way: More familiar? Less formal? More privately or at most semi-institutionalised? As nice as it is having the comfort of a limousine waiting and all worries taken away, the new worry is the lack of freedom. Or better to say: the different forms of freedom. At least I enjoy after the more or less long trip to be freed from the luggage, the liberty of moving around without worrying abut language (and my lack of knowing it) ….

________________

Entering the country – not being allowed to use the control boot for Russian citizens, the need to produce the documents: passport, visa, diplomatic ID – in some way it is for all of us a matter of exclusion: exclusiveness created by the establishment of an unholy trinity: the citizen, defined by the nationality of the country of destination; the non-citizen, defined by the country of destination and by the country of origin; and the super-(-non-)-citizen – defined by a universal un-belonging, being distinguished by being not really one of us nor truly one of them and not even one belonging to somebody else. Here it is somewhat real: quartium non datur.

________________

… coming back to the free movement and language …, it reminds me of a visit in Wroclaw a couple of years ago. I gave a presentation on a meeting which had been organised by the Democratic Women’s Union in Poland – and as actually everything had been in Polish language I had been encouraged to enjoy myself after the short performance I had to make. That is what I did, well looked after by two people, who showed me the beautiful city and not least the hidden places, not seen by the ordinary tourist. In the evening, however,  we returned to the others, to be correct: we met with the small group that had been organising the meeting. A small dinner – small in term of simplicity, of ‘this is what people really eat and drink’. Well, yes: and drink. Though I didn’t drink alcohol, it surely had been part of the gathering and we just enjoyed ourselves, laughed, discussed, disputed – chatted also but private things. At one point the conversation between the chairwoman and myself came to a halt. And speaking of a ‘conversation between the chairwoman and myself’ of course means that actually the translation stopped. Instead of translating, the others – hostess and chairwoman – engaged in conversation. For me it sounded somewhat harsh, confrontational …, and it soon turned out: the hostess/translator refused to translate, thinking what she had been asked to translate would be too …, too intimate, should not be translated – and after finally translating ‘against her will’, the relationship of all of us had been better then ever before. – Openness helps … .

I have to think about it frequently these days – when meeting my host-translator and thinking about the one who helped me when I had been here last year: the obedience version, submissive and keen to be useful; versus the proud version, knowing that all is a matter of exchange, real exchange as part of a ‘productive relationship’. Surely the lack of openness explains to some extent that I have little intention, little drive to do during the breaks all the things other would panting for. – Sure, I cannot put all the blame on him. Another reason is me, my silly, lazy me, lacking energy, standing in front of the mental kerbstone. But I can pass that also on as this kerbstone is heritage of my implanted Protestantism – even if I left my protestant coat long time at the cloth rack of a state-office, unregistering my church-membership, I left my infiltrated brain in the head which I still have. And finally, I had been definitely brought up in a house which celebrated this protestant spirit – and all my protest didn’t help and doesn’t help. Anyway, trusting Martin Luther it seems  at least that Jesus did not suffer to take the cross from our shoulders. 1534, Luther opines in a letter:

Jesus, who wanted to place you at this place as his tool, may fill you with the spirit of joy and eagerness to create plenty of fruit in his grace.

Here the German original – in case my own translation doesn’t satisfy you:

Der Herr Jesus, welcher euch zu seinem Werkzeug an diesen Platz setzen wollte, erfuelle euch mit dem Geiste der Freudigkeit und Strebsamkeit um recht viel Furcht zu schaffen nach seiner Gnade.

Still, briefly coming back to the other question. There may well be some gender dimension to it. Tatjana, some readers may know her – or they may read about here at one stage, Katerina, Timofey – and with gender issue I do not refer to the fact that I am male. Perhaps there is a specific self-confidence, perhaps there is also some special meaning in the fact that the Western fatherlands find their analogy here in the more frequent reference to the mother country. – And what do we then think about the high heals that are so common here? Expression of having an overview? Expression of raise – spirit of as matter of a ‘silent upheaval? –Erhebung – Erhobenheit – Erhabenheit – and in any case a broken back.

________________

After – for Moscow – a reasonably short time we arrive at Moskovskij Gosudarstvennyj Universitet, the old, majestic building – the one of the ‘Seven Sisters‘ standing on Sparrow Hills.

Later, I am entering the building – after going through another bureaucratic procedure. Now I have a special pass, stating something I cannot read but that makes me ‘one of us’, one of those allowed to freely enter and leave the building.

It is a majestic building, a massive building and a building which is in its architectural outlay and positioning rather interesting. I am mentioning it the first morning, while jogging through the large green area around the main building: parks, forest, sports grounds …, I nearly get lost. The building is frequently getting lost – I loose sight of it though knowing it is ‘there’, close but still not visible. – Instead of seeing the edifice, I watch the sunbeams making their way through the leaf canopy, showing the spider webs of the early morning and dance of the dust particles and pollen which is later covering the cars like a silken quilt of snow, allowing to see the mosquitoes venerating the light with their ballet – the haze of the air making good for the missing music. Later, when I am on the road next to the building I try finding my orientation by looking at the four sides …, I still do not know exactly to which extent they are equal to each other, symmetrically build and to which extent they differ. And interesting then looking not just at the massive building but also recognising the details.

– One may say like real life: what looks massive from the distance is dwarfing, disappearing when we are next to it, becomes so much part of the present that we do not recognise it in its distinctiveness. And what is so close, allows us to look at the all the details, the festooning of the walls, the difference given by shades and light – and the perspective we take …

… it is all about histories and history. Against may habit I pause while I am jogging: at the monument in the little park opposite of the entrance to the wing in which I am accommodated: 1941-1945 – the flames of the eternal fire, which is part of the monument waver in the lite wind of the early morning. It is still very quite – some birds singing, occasionally the sound of the engine of a bus, sounding as if it would enter from another world. From history, bare of the histories, an overview is quickly gained.

– The other day, reading the Moscow newspaper: the awakening extreme right, even the fascists creeping out of their little holes-in-the-wall, I know even better why I am pausing: a short but honest acknowledgment of what happened during those years, and what found its roots not leats in the country of which I still have the passport.

________________

If we agree with the interpreting the concrete as ‘a synthesis of many determinations, thus a unity of the diverse’

(Marx, Karl [1857/58]: Economic Manuscripts of 1857-58 [First Version of Capital]: in: in: Karl Marx. Frederick Engels. Collected Works. Volume 28: Marx: 1857-1861; London: Lawrence&Wishart, 1986: 38)

, we may also say the concretised, condensed, monumentalised history is the position we take towards and the interpretation of – past, present and future – reality.

________________

The first morning I am collected at the main entrance – this day is all about the meeting at the All-Russian Centre of Living Standard, contacts I still have from other opportunities, a net spanning amongst others between Rome, Ankara, Berlin and Amsterdam – the small Cork, that is me, somewhat in the dragrope. And of course, being in Moscow, it had been an opportunity to meet. ‘We’ll organise a small seminar’, Evgheni told me when we talked the first time about my visit. ‘It would be a great opportunity to get a little bit more known about the Social Quality.’ Fine with me and so I am collected at the main gate of the old university building in the morning at 8:30. Wisdom: a short walk to the Metro-station. ‘It would be foolish to take the car. We have to go the other end of the city.’ It would have been silly indeed not only for traffic reasons -I still remember last year’s nightmare when I had been brought by car to the airport; but travelling by Metro also allows some sightseeing. It even gives a little insight into history of the country’s politics, as expressed by the Metro. The very ‘ornamental period’, showing the achievements and also celebrating the achievers, the ‘imperial style’, the very simple building – different political periods and also different economic periods … – and surely also just different standards of, views on beauty. And the little ‘individual stories’: Kropotkin station, the cathedral, the basilica, as some want it: being destroyed, the grabble used for building a public swimming pool … – At the other end of the city …, including changing the metro line, and including getting of just to look at the remarkable Пло́щадь Револю́ции (Ploshchad Revolutsii) station means a trip of about one hour: fast, and only very short times waiting for the next train. And it means standing cramped between people: tired faces; people reading the newspapers; others holding books and changing from time to time with some effort from page to page; and several people around holding an e-reader in their hand, scrolling through the text. Not less sure: many engaged in vivid chats. – We leave the train …, yes, it seems “this my world” cannot do without cars: the Institute’s driver is already waiting with the limousine at the metro station where we get off, driving us the short way to the Institute. The small seminar turns out to be a larger event, the conference room is packed – two ‘reports’ given, followed by a discussion. I begin with my presentation – and Subetto is asked to raise some questions before the floor is opened for questions from the audience. Then Subetto’s presentation on ‘The social quality of the life as a rart (component) of the system of modern qualitativism’ – interesting, wide-ranging from Aristotle to today’s environmentalist challenges. First now, it is up to me: my right to begin with posing questions – sure, I have some questions, but I fell also obliged. And in my mind I anticipate already to upcoming meeting in Vilnus at Mykolas Romeris University next month: viva voce, one on ‘The Impact of Information Technologies on Increasing Efficiency of  the Health Care Institution: analysis, evaluation and effectiveness’, the other on ‘Family Policy Formation In Lithuania’

So much bureaucracy before – the ‘review of the reviewers’, providing the documents, the verification of status … – and after they first told me I would participate via skype, I had been told ‘another life-show’, another two days travelling in order to be four hours or so present. – But as formal as that will be too, I will not have a gown in my suitcase, actually I will not have a suitcase – travel light, tough life is not necessarily easy then.

Back to the All-Russians. Both discussions are rather interesting – the one dealing with a more traditional, well-ordered, power-point scaffolded presentation – which nevertheless brings some powerful points forward; the other trying to capture complexity ….

…  how to deal with it: complexity and the means we have for capturing it? The other day, last Sunday in Istanbul, I visited an exhibition in the Pera Muezesi: works of İhsan Cemal Karaburçak. And he had been struggling with the same question, saying:

When I paint, I am not concerned about the things in the back or foreground. What matters to me is to draw a two-dimensional picture on a two-dimensional canvas. Lending perspective is both easy and equally deceptive.

But he equally said

I am a painter of colour. Since the sun kills all the colours, I may be inclined to like nature more when it grows dark.

But perhaps all this is not really about complexity or its neglect and instead we are looking more a different qualities. The other day I am getting aware if this, being on the globalistics conference, talking about economic developments, engaging in seemingly abstract development-calculations, looking at the graphs with the more or less differentiated curves, contesting calculations but more discussing the underlying definitions of the variables …

  • concrete – abstract — complex – simple

Or should we say instead

  • concrete – abstract — simple – complex

Terms and terminology are surely limited in grasping what we are actually looking at – it is also the experience from the day before when I walked from Kropotkin – the basilica is there again – along Lenin library to the Red Square, around the Kremlin, looking at the GUM and then standing in front of the Mausoleum, remembering the various memorial inscriptions on the wall behind it. Even not being here for the first time it is in some way so different. I saw so many historical places, celebrations of the great men, rarely women of history, engaging with so many great thinkers – dead since long time and still relevant: alive in their own way. And in several respects not much is different here: like Paris, Berlin, Dublin … – and still, there is something different too. Even if it is the celebration of ‘great men and events’ here too, there is some part of that carries also another message: it had been the great men, the great events that actually had been nothing else than the concretised, condensed, monumentalised history not in the position we take towards and the interpretation of – past, present and future – reality. It is the monumentalisation of peoples’ engagement and practice. It is especially here that I feel it – perhaps to some extent because it is in some way also MY history, MY practice – in the understanding of “a practice in which I took in some way part”. Surely only mediated: through the reading of so much of the countries unforgettable literature: Nikolai Leskov, Ivan Sergeyevich Turgenev, the often forgotten, unknown Aleksey Nikolayevich Tolstoy, Maxim Gorki …. Literature from later years too. And only parts of the history of other contries is so familiar to me: Seghers’ and Brecht’s Germany, Balzac’s France for instance – but rarely merging in such close way as here: the everyday’s struggles, the political battles and the ‘great men’ …

________________

But indeed, I came here to work. I am happy for Timofey. Seeing him about an hour before the workshop in which I am actively taking part in the debates with Andrey and Leonid – we know for some time now from the work on the Almanac History & Mathematics  – I see how nervous he is. Finally I could give him some stuff for the preparation of the translation. But still: I told him again and again: I won’t read this. Flow with the crow – it does not mean opportunism but engagement with reality.

He is a little bit a nerd if this is the correct term. And he is surely caught in prejudices: still the Golden West – and surely a most appropriate issue for this conference. Listening to the various presentations is surely enlightening – leaving those aside who present more an ideology or themselves than anything else, ignoring those how are only here because they want to be seen rather than see, those who want to be engaged rather than engaging themselves in cooperation. It is in particular interesting as it clearly shows one of the central difficulties we have in social science – and in real life: the loss of a common …, not language: practice. And it is the paradox that we really see in everyday’s life and we need to reflect more upon. Apparently, seemingly we grow ever closer together. And nevertheless, in actual fact it is only a space of non-communication, of deception that emerges and in which we get absorbed. – And, for me at least, the question following me all the time is to which extent I am actually truly engaging in and aiming on simple and genuine cooperation in order to enhancing knowledge and knowledge-based practice. The other way round: I also have to make sure that ‘I make a living’ rather than allowing pure life to disappear.

I mention it permanently, as I occasionally (or permanently even) have to leave this real, present world – presence as matter of time and space. The pressure to interrupt what I am doing here and now: work on the book which I edit together with Bernadette – now, at its final stage it requires frequent communication; the involvement in an EU-FP7-project – I didn’t step out as others did, using their senses and avoiding work-overload, and as I actually ended up with more work then expected, doing part of the work of those just mentioned, I have to maintain contact with Anna – and I also have to look after things with Bálint in Budapest and Aitor in Barcelona; the membership on the committee for the Stockholm conference, and the jury for the Jörg-Huffschmid award 2011  …., Vanessa mailing from Athens – of course last minute-question; other projects …- and not least the reminders I feel obliged to send as people do not come back with promised and/or needed information. All this requires stepping out of the flow of living globally, roaming around in different places, the different local universities, research centres and coffee-shops and tea-houses, the debates and chats with ‘the locals’;  and it means going back to the ‘global centre’. As I wrote on an earlier occasion – in the post PHILOSOPHY ON KERBSTONES III – … AND DANCE:

The tension we face, choosing between the small, local place in the alley way – sitting on a stool for a tea – and reducing our communication to those we know: limited by knowledge of language, of culture and the lack of a wireless internet connection – and the star pubs, the shamrock pub and the coffee shop we know from Barcelona, Munich, Helsinki, Budapest, Taipei, Melbourne, Rome – and even the Campus of the university in Cork: One world as we always wanted it, the security of knowledge, of knowing, of accessibility – the world present in this place, wherever it is located; and the rest of the world also present: free internet.

And there is surely much deception in both worlds – and even more if we think about leaving the local, diving into the global. Which direction do we have in mind? Entering the global by entering the for us alien, beguiling local market of a country we visit and leaving this global by entering the weird wireless world, defined by a code without any smell, without any taste and sound: htmlHigh Technic Minimalised Life?

________________

A conference break – I retreat, sit down on the edge of the well in front of the memorial: 1941-1945. The venue of the conference is close – nevertheless it is quite, tranquil. It reminds me of a visit to to the concentration camp near Nordhausen. I remember the one year – I had to go there on my own: it is …. a beautiful spot. The forest, at the time the blossoming flowers, the trees with the bright green leafs, nourished by the sun of late April – a beautiful place and part of European history that we cannot imagine – indeed, as Jean Mialet, French survivor said

This is what hell must be like.

History – so different, so many histories and so different places. Sitting there I look into the sky, see the clouds moving, allowing me  a glimpse of real life, unlike the life of traffic …. that turmoils on the nearby street.

________________

I am actually not so negative or positive about one or the other – as long as we are allowed to control the borders. And mind: we are we – not me nor you.

Is that the reason behind making survival for the prophet easier in another country than his/her own? The stranger as mentioned by Georg Simmel: the one of which we can be sure that he leaves as well – and doesn’t reveal the subterfuge. And is that stranger able to stand against the other stranger – the one for whom three dimensions, the 3-D, does not mean the free movement in time, space and action therein but simple a dirty, dangerous and degrading job.

Zygmunt Bauman makaes an on page 1o of his article ‘From Agora to the Marketplace, and Whereto from Here?‘ an important point.

In an insecure world,

and he elaborates that this is a world that is made insecure by interested political-economic groups

security is the name of the game. Security is the main purpose of the game and its paramount stake. … It is a value that in practice, if not in theory, dwarfs and elbows out from view and attention all other values – including the values dear to ‘us’ while suspected to be hated by ‘them’, and for that reason declared the prime cause of their wish to harm us and our duty to conquer and punish them. In a world as insecure as ours, personal freedom of word and action, right to privacy, access to truth – all those things we used to associate with democracy and in whose name we still go to war – need to be trimmed or suspended … Or at least this is what the official version, confirmed by the official practice, maintains.

________________

Children – in their play – imagine almightiness, want to be and imagine to be magicians. Waving the magic wand is sufficient to change the world; spreading out the arms, defining them as wings makes us fly; setting fourth an idea makes it become real. Adults lost this; so they explore – in their play – things, they say ideally by positivist approaches. But again and again it is history they want to explore, look at the other or even more investigate the history of the other. It is so attractive as the subject is concluded, cloistered. No change is needed and no change is even possible. And there is obviously a limitation to exploration that makes it even more attractive: the many blanks, not verifiable. Open to nearly any projections. The ideas the child uses in the play to change the here and now are translated by the adult into the projections: the other, the past – the different interpretations.

Looking at the scripture on the old papyrus allowing us to see the greatness of humankind – or allowing us to see how little really changed.

It is so difficult to understand the true history, the history of histories and to make it part of the own life – not the life in some self-erected cloister, not the life of the hedonist, cocooned individual but the life of every social human being:

Philosophers have hitherto only interpreted the world in various ways; the point is to change it.

Which can well be seen as a stricter wording for what Johann Wolfgang von Goethe said:

Whatever you can do, or dream you can, begin it. Boldness has genius, power and magic.

In any case, it clears the way for moving forward, recognising that

the standpoint of the old materialism is civil society; the standpoint of the new is human society or social humanity.

________________

There is time left after the working day – not least as the evenings are bright, it is only after ten that it is getting beginning to get dark. Still, I hesitate to go to the city centre, the touristy places. After some hesitation I decide to go for a stroll around the campus. As impressive as the green belt is, as quick one reaches …, an estate. I am not sure if this is the correct term. Or I am actually more or less sure that it is not the correct term. Is suburb more appropriate? The stroll turns out to be a two-hour walk – along the main road, ‘walking around a square’. Even if the exact figure is apparently not clear – the first day I had been told that there are officially 10 million people living in Moscow, much less than the figure I had been told last year: 16 million,  but still quite impressive, especially for an Irish country-boy – all these people have to be accommodated and transported. Broad roads to accommodate the traffic congestions during rush hours, huge buildings of different kind – I walk along the large park somewhere, the smaller shopping centres, smaller parks …, and the countless small shops, little booths – something that seems to be so common here as well as I mentioned it when writing about the stumbling blocks. And finally, actually rather close to the main building of the university there is a market: stands selling fruits, vegetables, nearly everything. And the stands are of nearly any kind: a woman, holding one bunch of flowers in her hands, having a second bunch in a bucket next to her feet side by side with the large stands with proper tables, sun roofs, nearly looking like litte shops, the small basilica, not politically pushed away but pushed into a corner by the relentless challenges of daily life that cannot be left to any god or holiness. The challenges of survival, of which probably one of the the nicest is to take a photo of the girlfriend, standing under the lilac tree, watching the children on the trike or sitting together with the venerable, listening to the old tales and contemplating about …, of course: the future – People’s life – go where they live ….; yes, and go where they shop – not designing their life, but living it, reproducing it in the various dimensions.

 ________________

The last working day – not part of the conference anymore. I meet Andrey and Leonid. It is a rather open talk – open in terms of expected topics, results and also in terms of the assumption. We do not have the same point of departure, nor the same frame of reference. What we actually have is a common interest: Defining clear questions and opening spaces, not by kerbstones, not even by stepping stones. A field that allows for, that encourages amalgamations across borders. The editorial work, the ventilation around different networking projects, the involvement in the new centre here at Lomonosov University  – the realisation of globalistics …

And at the same time the thought: does all this really make sense, is it meaningful? Are things getting more meaningful because said on a different stage? Or is it about developing something new by putting it in different contexts and linking it with other contacts? Crossing lines, climbing over kerbstones, using stepping stones – dance floors?

________________

Some time left – though I cannot deny that I would like to be home, currently it means: returning to Ankara, back in everyday’s life, back to routines – including the Turkish coffee, the tea and the simit for breakfast. Still, I have time left here in Moscow. Sitting in a coffee shop for lengthy spells: writing. But not only. Katerina contacted me the evening before and we arrange to meet. ‘Товарищ Ленин – in front of the mausoleum.’ She agrees to my proposal: ‘Yes, in front of the Lenin Mausoleum.’ And so it means strolling a last time across the Red Square, around and through the Kremlin. The Lenin library. There is some very specific contentment in the simplicity. Looking into the faces of the people, looking at those sitting on the banks in the sun, with the books. Perhaps it is the contentment of the reading worker – the awareness of the reader to be the actual main player, the awareness of being at the end – in one or another way – part of the history. A peculiar humility of the real maker of history. And the forbearance … – And even the ‘young Russia’ has it – the young woman accompanying me, showing me – as she did about a year ago – so much in the brief time: not in terms of places but in terms of …, well, possibly a glimpse into the future.

And I think even more about it today, after having met Diarmaid in the morning, asking somebody for the direction ended in a nice and lengthy chat

Aghabullogue meets Dublin in Moscow!

The guy I asked was an Irish fellow, now working in Moscow – and we had been chatting about the Irish history, the resistance and the lack of it, the visit of the Queen which we both missed … – whatever the similarities, dissimilarities, the different ways …: the future can and will be, for the good or the worse, only one future.

________________

Looking at all these places, strolling along with her I am asking myself what did the golden archway  across the red square and the bucks of stars on the green of park-lanes bring to the country?

A short article comes to my mind – I read it the one day in a Moscow newspaper, dealing with road rage, apparently a frequent problem – and with it the abuse of the migalka. As short paragraph from the article:

‘When another car refuses to let him pass he (the driver) shouts abuse through his loudspeaker.

‘Do you want to get shot in the head, retard?’ The driver booms on tape.

‘When the incident took place, only the driver was in the car,’ a spokesperson for the Emergency Situations Ministry told …”

Another article in the same paper on taxis: unregulated, self-regulated and involving quarrels about stands that are at the, no: beyond the margins of the law, supposedly including even the use of weapons.

For me it doesn’t say anything really about the Russian soul, but it tells a whole lot about the new system: open class division, a growing gap between rich and poor and a tormenting law of competition – isn’t it right. May be worthwhile to think about this: What we know as competition law is in the US termed anti-trust law. And a definition of this is given in the following from Law.com – an occasionally useful web-dictionary for law-stuff:

antitrust laws

n. acts adopted by Congress to outlaw or restrict business practices considered to be monopolistic or which restrain interstate commerce. 

The little note from which I quoted provoked on my facebook site the question:

Does this means, if the driver is not on his own shooting is allowed?

And thinking about these developments I return in my contemplation also to other times: the golden ancient times with the purity of virtues, the Renaissance, now celebrated for the reflection of morals and the creation and collection of inventions and arts. The monuments – monumentalisation of history as the position we take towards and the interpretation of – past, present and future – reality.

Sure, we may easily conclude that at the end all these current developments could well mean another Renaissance, another original accumulation of treasures of a nee era of global culture. But we may also remember what we easily overlook when voyeuring the excessive splendour: that its real pedestal is not the visible marble block. The real pedestal are the bones of the people who left their life, who had been sacrificed and whose life had been washed away by the streams of the blood of people like themselves. – A golden arch …, it is on a red square …

Coming back to Zygmunt Bauman’s article, we read on page 12

If 40 years ago the income of the five richest percent of the world population was thirty time higher than the income of the poorest five per cent, 15 years ago it was already sixty time higher, and by 2002 it reached the factor of 114.

Tanzania earns 2.2 billion dollars a year which it divides among 25 million inhabitants. The Goldman Sachs Ban earns 2.6 billion dollars, which is then divided between 161 stockholders.

And there is a paradox going hand in hand with all this: Especially today it is consumption that is valued – I had been already told the first day, when we went to the All-Russian centre, that today the shopping centres are the landmarks, the stones of the edifices providing guidance

In the old times it had been the plants, the factories.

 The paradox however is the following: formerly it had been said ‘The customer is king.’ And today the appreciation of the customer is expressed in different ways: private shop detectives, in many cases employees of few multinational private securitas-businesses, x-raying at the entrance of Ankara’s modern shopping malls and … – there is a new variant here: Entering the grocery supermarket, not even a French passport (have a guess of which chain the shop is?) would help to surround the control – a somewhat funny and surely wasteful one: rather than randomly checking handbags at the exit, all handbags etc. are have to be packed into a plastic bag which then is sealed.

________________

Another day passed, another trip, doing some ‘business abroad’, allowing interesting debates, causing other disappointments, bringing some support and relief and meaning to accept some new tasks …

… and another evening to be spent, not at work this time – instead, an opportunity to lean back: Moscow, an evening at the Bolshoi: humans, swanlike moves on the stage, music carrying us away, lifting us on soft clouds, nothing challenges us to think about the endless Scenes Behind the Scenes; and all the rehearsals, the work, also the anguish that is now forgotten, transformed into something of which we do not even see the tension which is still present in the very moment of the appearance of beauty.

But it is here: Quartum datur. An area – a jasnaja poljana. A plane, a space with stones, a variety of stones like a scenography.

Detachments – Attachments – the permanent, at least frequent attempt to disenchant power – power executed by others and the fascination by power as emerging ability: the idea of being able to do something, to change and create. Not more and not less than the question of drawing borders, redefining and overcoming them … – allowing thinking in complex scenographies.

________________

The engine of the aircraft revs – TK 7365, direct flight from Moscow operated by Anadolujet. Murat will wait at the other end to collect me.

I am tired, exhausted, overwhelmed – actually I do not know which term is the most appropriate – perhaps it is nothing of it. And instead it is the acknowledgement of what Johann Wolfgang von Goethe wrote in the West-Eastern Divan

TELL it the wise alone, for when

Will the crowd cease from mockery !

Him would I laud of living men

Who longs a fiery death to die.

In coolness of those nights of love

Which thee begat, bade thee beget,

Strange promptings wake in thee and move,

While the calm taper glimmers yet.

No more in darkness canst thou rest,

Waited upon by shadows blind,

A new desire has thee possessed

For procreant joys of loftier kind.

Distance can hinder not thy flight ;

Exiled, thou seekest a point illumed;

And, last, enamoured of the light,

A moth art in the flame consumed.

And while thou spurnest at the best,

Whose word is ” Die and be new-born! ”

Thou bidest but a cloudy guest

Upon an earth that knows not morn.

And the German, the real version.

Sagt es niemand, nur den Weisen,

Weil die Menge gleich verhöhnet:

Das Lebendige will ich preisen,

Das nach Flammentod sich sehnet.

In der Liebesnächte Kühlung,

Die dich zeugte, wo du zeugtest,

Überfällt dich fremde Fühlung,

Wenn die stille Kerze leuchtet.

Nicht mehr bleibest du umfangen

In der Finsternis Beschattung,

Und dich reißet neu Verlangen

Auf zu höherer Begattung.

Keine Ferne macht dich schwierig,

Kommst geflogen und gebannt,

Und zuletzt, des Lichts begierig,

Bist du Schmetterling verbrannt.

Und so lang du das nicht hast,

Dieses: Stirb und werde!

Bist du nur ein trüber Gast

Auf der dunklen Erde.

The danger of kerbstones not being transformed to stepping stones – the bright scenography being overshadowed by the grey of the gravestones: marking the places where we find those who never lived, those, who remained in the presence, mistaking it as life.

Vsevo dobrovo!