Social Law In Ireland, the Current Crisis and the Emerging New Colonialism

In a recent report on the development of social policy and social law in Ireland (an annual report submitted to the Max Planck Institute for foreign and international law) I provided an interpretation, drawing a rather frightening outlook not only on the current power structures but going beyond, highlighting the resurfacing of a scary tradition, though some ‘agency’ changed. I contended that we may speak “of a second historical famine: what once appeared as crop failure but had in actual fact been a policy of famishment by the british colonial power appears to day as policy of mismanagement and greed by some superrich is actually a policy of famishment by policies in the global colonialising financial sector. Foreign, not least German capital established over a long time a dependency which is now extended beyond the climax of the crisis. It is still the foreign capital that, under the sheet anchor of the IMF and World Bank promises to act as savor of the economy but not urge towards a sustainable development Instead it opts for short-term oriented measures, systematically fading out the social costs.”

Will the current, i.e. be radical enough to recognise this and act sufficiently radical in elaborating its response?

so appropriate for launching something new

(Sorry, surely most will be in English – as ‘lingua franca’ – as we say all around, using these very English terms 😉

“Lange habe ich mich gesträubt,

Endlich gab ich nach;

Wenn das alte Ich zerstäubt,

Wird das neue wach.

Und solang Du das nicht hast,

Dieses: Stirb und werde!

Bist Du nur ein trüber Gast

Auf der dunklen Erde!”

Goethe “West-Östlicher Divan”

An interesting concept of academic publishing

Reading in :”Die Marktrwirtschaft des 21. Jahrhhunderts”  (The Market Economy of the 21st Century) A stunningly meaningful sentence – I translate it here: “With this we arrive at the infinite tale of pensions. I am sorry: I can only repeat what I said in “Gescheitert” (“Failed” – the title of another book) and on many other occasions.”

And then the author writes it and repeats it. In a book where he criticises today’s capitalist market economy and frequently calls for environmental awareness and caution. But the book sells well, Mr Flassbeck, despite it just repeats what you already said yourself elsewhere? And the rainforest will still have enough wood, after wasting some of it for the paper on which the repetition is printed and marketed? – Well, there is somewhere something wrong …

Third Level Education – where to go?

Talking last week to academics at the Department of the University of Debrecen, I drew a parallel between developments of the economy and third level education today. It is surely true that a growing number of young people avails of university education and obtains degrees. However, they gain useful skills, being usually well trained specialist with a higher qualification; however, academic training as matter of universal and critical thinking is increasingly left to a small number of students only. I contended “Not least the tiger economies of the recent years show that the increasing number of graduates goes hand in hand with maintaining and even strengthening an elitist system of third level education. The economies – and the universities – are able to prosper for a short period of time. But they do so only to fail after the short blossom in even more sever ways. What is needed is not more specialist and diversified (in terms of differentiated) offers but more critical engagement.” The discussion shows that the idea of third level education as matter of engaging in critical universal thinking can offer very well an also financially feasible answer by universities. Orienting on more students then means challenging more students to get engaged in real education rather than inflationary schemes that are actually non-starters. We can see already today the increasing difficulties of maintaining high numbers of students. And offering more of the same cannot be an answer.

Not least recent debates at the School of Applied Social Science at University College of Cork, aiming on developing a “MSocSc ‘Routes’” are on an entirely wrong way, especially if they go the way of piecing up a somewhat ‘artificial offer’ without clear concept. Colleagues who see here another opportunity to eclectically merging existing offers under a new heading act in an irresponsible manner. Claiming with such a strategy a process of establishing a profile is surely misleading. “Profiles of knowledge, of research is about having something to say. They are about looking for questions rather than providing answers on issues that are actually not a problem.” An eclectic MSocSc ‘Routes’ can be compared with offering a system as we just saw it collapsing on the financial markets: insure what cannot be insured to create another insurance for the next layer of investment that cannot be insured. “This is not a paradox. This is not about contradictions of bubble creation. It is simply about a lack of responsibility.”

Crisis … and where to go

In some respect it can be said that the real dimension of the socio-economic crisis is only now getting obvious. And for Ireland it is surely as well a crisis with some very specific dimension. Peter Herrmann suggests in a contribution elaborated in connection with his work at the Max-Planck-Institute for Foreign and International Social Law that one may speak “of a second historical famine: what once appeared as crop failure but had in actual fact been a policy of famishment by the british colonial power appears to day as policy of mismanagement and greed by some superrich is actually a policy of famishment by policies in the global colonialising financial sector. Foreign, not least German capital established over a long time a dependency which is now extended beyond the climax of the crisis. It is still the foreign capital that, under the sheet anchor of the IMF and World Bank promises to act as savor of the economy but not urge towards a sustainable development Instead it opts for short-term oriented measures, systematically fading out the social costs.

Relevant in this context is surely the following document: ATTAC Scientific Council_Euro-crisis_3-11